Apply as Reviewer
Illumine Publication House invites qualified researchers, academicians, and industry experts to join our growing community of peer reviewers. As a new and developing publishing organization, we are committed to building a strong and diverse reviewer network that supports high-quality, ethical, and unbiased academic publishing.
Our first journal, Noventia Journal, follows a rigorous double-blind peer review system. To enhance transparency and strengthen the review process, we will soon be launching our dedicated peer-review platform:
Illumine Publication Scholar Verse — an advanced system designed to streamline reviewer assignments, communication, and manuscript evaluations.
We encourage scholars from all disciplines to apply and become an integral part of our review board.
Why Become a Reviewer?
Contribute to the quality and integrity of academic research
Strengthen your academic profile and gain recognition as a subject-expert reviewer
Receive reviewer certificates for every completed review
Gain early access to emerging research in your field
Become part of an expanding peer-review platform under Illumine Publication House
Eligibility Criteria
Applicants must meet at least one of the following:
Possess a Master’s degree, PhD, or equivalent qualification
Be a faculty member, researcher, or industry professional with domain expertise
Have published research papers in reputable journals, conferences, or books
Demonstrate strong analytical and writing skills
Be able to provide timely and constructive reviews
Reviewer Honorarium
As a token of appreciation for your valuable contribution, Illumine Publication House provides:
₹200 per manuscript for each successfully completed peer review in the initial phase
Once the Illumine Publication Scholar Verse platform officially launches and based on:
Consistency,
Quality of reviews,
Number of manuscripts reviewed,
we will gradually increase the default honorarium per paper for eligible reviewers.
Our goal is to fairly reward reviewers who demonstrate dedication, punctuality, and high-quality feedback.
Responsibilities of Reviewers
Evaluate manuscripts objectively, confidentially, and ethically
Provide clear, detailed, and constructive feedback
Identify strengths, weaknesses, relevance, and originality of the manuscript
Recommend acceptance, revision, or rejection based on scholarly merit
Avoid any conflict of interest during the review